Should the law treat kids differently

They have a powerful ally: Their immaturity is real, and it must be taken into account in a justice system that is striving to be both effective and fair. New medical imaging techniques, such as PET scans and functional MRI, are starting to reveal aspects of brain development that take place during adolescence.

We must consider the parenting when it comes to sentence young children. These concerns, which were fundamental in the creation of the juvenile justice system, are now the focus of other studies by the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. A juvenile cannot be tried with an adult S.

Should the Law Treat Kids and Adults Differently?

We sometimes hear that we learn from our mistakes. Should all young adolescents be evaluated for competence, even in juvenile court?

Supreme Court has ruled capital punishment unconstitutional for anyone who hasnt celebrated their 16th birthday. What we found The results of our study strongly suggest that about one-third of to year-olds and one-fifth of to year-olds probably are not competent to stand trial.

Should Law Treat Kids and Adults Differently?

Is criminal court trial fair for young defendants who are disadvantaged by their immaturity, when adults who are similarly disadvantaged by mental disabilities are deemed incompetent to stand trial? And how should policymakers deal with adolescents charged with a serious crime who are found incompetent to be tried in either system?

Robert Schwartz, cofounder and executive director of the Juvenile Law Center and a member of the Research Network and the study teamnotes that some states require a finding of competence before a juvenile is transferred to criminal court.

Historically, the concept of incompetence has been used almost exclusively for adult defendants with mental illness or mental retardation. Finally, we should point out again that our study of juvenile competence does not address two other critical factors in dealing with young offenders: Send us your comments Related posts: Hypothetical situation from the MacArthur Judgment Evaluation.

The concurrent Brazill and Tate trials served to heighten the public misconception that juvenile violent crime is on the rise; in fact, recent figures show a precipitous drop over the last five years.

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia now have no minimum age at which children can be tried as adults for the most serious offenses. To provide cultural, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity, we conducted the testing at sites in Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Virginia, and Florida.

Below, a few of the arguments posited by both sides of the juvenile crime debate. Our study confronts policymakers and courts with an uncomfortable reality: Our justice system depends upon holding perpetrators responsible for their actions.

If some young defendants who could not be tried as adults can be tried in juvenile courts, are there changes that need to be made in the juvenile system? Further, the Board is required to satisfy itself that the juvenile has not been tortured by the police or any other person and to take steps if ill-treatment has occurred.

And what kinds of deficits have implications for law, policy, and practice?Jul 02,  · In that case, you will have to explain calmly to all of your children that the world is full of different kinds of people and that their grandparents have a few strange quirks.

Let your children each express themselves and Author: Parents. Jul 30,  · How a Will Treating Children Differently Can Still Be Fair Image When couples like Rupert Murdoch and Wendi Deng divorce, as they did inone issue that often arises is how an inheritance.

Should the Law Treat Kids Differently? Should the Law Treat Kids and Adults Differently? - Should the Law Treat Kids Differently? introduction?? By Jessica Reaves Thursday, May 17, Follow @TIME When a child. When a child kills, does he instantly become an adult? Or does he maintain some trappings of childhood, despite the gravity of his actions?

These are the questions plaguing the American legal system today, as the violent acts of juvenile offenders continue to make headlines.

Should we kill all source of hope, all second chances, and banish our youths to lifetime imprisonment with no turning back? After all, a child has no rights in our society, should he be punished the same way a responsible adult would? Or, should law treat kids and adults differently?

All of it depends on many, many circumstances. Crimes are most associated with adults. Murder is especially most associated with adults. When a teenager commits such a crime such as murder they must be tried, and they should not be treated with leniency and coddling.

Should the law treat kids differently
Rated 0/5 based on 16 review